![]() Nine times out of ten they are sketching things that are 3D in nature and are using the laws of perspective to represent them in 2D in a way that can clearly communicate the design intent to the technician or engineer who will need to create a digital 3D model.īelieve it or not, the footwear industry is primarily 2D focused with the workflow going from emotional 2D sketching to detailed illustrator plan drawings for the factories. Many of our customers have little to no digital 3D experience and primarily use Photoshop of Procreate. Thank you for your feedback have developed the tool primarily to bridge the 2D and 3D divide. Unless we can tell a client: “Just put on some goggles and click on this link, and stuff will install and you will be in our meeting in a few minutes” it would be really hard to get traction for this use. Also please price it right, there’s a lot of nonsense pricing in your industry.Īlso just like in a physical office, or a Zoom meeting: there should be no price of admission, no even account required to attend a meeting. In summary: if you can have a tool that you can open rhino files, review concurrently with team, and mark it up, you have something very exciting and very useful. Also a modeler should be able to be still in rhino and send updates to the meeting, so live-linking to Rhino makes even more sense, tools like Rhino.Inside let you do that. The idea of going to a ‘cloud’ lobby looking for stuff is not very appealing, and adds a lot of friction and cognitive load IMO. In future builds you can have comparative sessions between models (flipping them like layers on-off), etc.Īll this needs to be done simply: A little toolbar/or ‘watch folder’ that handles all this bureaucratic steps between points A and B, and all the round-tripping. ![]() So you would need to have a way to send 3-5 file to a Gravity sketch session, review/mark up each and then get back to work in rhino. And as in any real world meeting goes, there would be more than one rhino file involved. Then of course do the round-trip back to Rhino. In your case, offering a way to bring one Rhino model (I say one, as a starting point) and meet as a team, walk around it, having such model displaying all the same materials/layers/names that it had in Rhino, and be able to mark-up/sketch annotations would be really useful. ![]() We do a lot of modeling work, and we do a lot of VR work, and are very comfortable having VR being a viewing/presentation/review mode (what it does best), and then use the tools that are best for each topology type to do the modeling work. In the case of our team we don’t see a lot of value in modeling in VR. Very impressive work Seyi, this is showing great potential that could be more expansive and inclusive to your current core value proposition.Īs you know we users are all different and have different preferences and needs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |